
Honestly I used to get angry every time I saw that some disaffected youth had gone on a rampage with automatic weapons and a sackload of ammunition, slaughtering dozens of innocent people who happened, unfortunately, to be in range of this mental case when he had his meltdown. I was irritated by the ease with which anyone could buy guns and as many bullets as they could possibly use in two lifetimes. And not just ordinary handguns like the one in the poster either... we're talking about serious military grade equipment here.
So when a killing spree happens, the story can run on CNN for anything from a few days to a week depending on the body count and the age of the casualties. Maybe over a week if the death toll reaches double figures. That is followed of course by the full inquest into what caused the protagonist to commit such a heinous crime. Video games? Violence in the cinema? Bullying in school? Disengaged parents? Whatever. The important thing to recognise is that "Guns don't kill people. People kill people". Yes, some people actually do say that. Anyway, as soon as the news goes cold everybody goes back to waiting for the next atrocity, and the ugly cycle is stuck in an infinite loop.
Just a quick aside... I find the arguments used to oppose gun control so amusing. There's the constitutional argument (if there was ever a document that badly needs dragging into the 21st century...). Let's be honest, the UK government has cut back spending on the armed forces to the extent that they don't have enough redcoats to send over to rampage through American villages anymore. And of course, the US government controls the most expensive, most advanced military forces in the world, so I'm fairly confident that they could fend off even a substantial redcoat attack without too much assistance from the general public.
Then there's the brilliant argument that if the victims had themselves been armed, then the psycho wouldn't have attacked them in the first place. Wasn't that called Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD for short) during the sixties? I'm pretty sure that absurd idea was canned a long long time ago. Alternatively, if the psycho wasn't deterred by all the weaponry pointing back at him, at least the victims (and I use the term loosely) would be able to fight back. Yes, rather than eliminate the a handful of psychos, we should transform the whole population into psychos, thereby leveling the playing field. Makes sense. Seemingly intelligent politicians argue this point without a hint of irony.
And finally of course, you have to realise that people get murdered all over the world, even in places where guns are heavily controlled. So it's clearly not a gun control issue at all. America got it right again! Well, read the numbers above (or below). Yes, people do get killed all over the world, and guns are often involved. But no gun control in the US = many deaths, while gun control in the UK = few deaths. So yes, I would have to concede that gun control might only eliminate 99% of the problem*.
There's no doubt that this is an extremely emotive subject for Americans. It used to be an emotive subject for me too, given my opposition to anyone killing anyone, anywhere. But after I had witnessed the loop completed a few times I realised that this is about Americans killing Americans in America. It's an American problem for Americans to address. If they don't care enough to fix it, why should I lose sleep? With this rationalisation in mind, I now witness every new incident dispassionately. After all, if Americans are preoccupied with killing each other, maybe they won't feel the need to leave their shores to kill non-Americans. That's a deal I can live with. So it's a few muttered words of sympathy for the victims, and flick over to the BBC, taking the greatest care to skip swiftly over Fox News.
Don't misunderstand me. I'm not unsympathetic, especially towards the victims. I'm just fed up with being in the loop. Do something about it or stop reporting it, I say. If this is the kind of society you want to live in, fine. If not, then do something about changing it. But please stop with the outraged bleating. It's pointless and impotent.
*For the sake of accuracy, here are the 2014 statistics for firearms deaths per 100,000 population per year for the nations in the poster. Source: Wikipedia
Japan 0.6
Great Britain 0.25
Switzerland 2.91 (mostly suicides - who'd have guessed...)
Canada 2.22
Israel 1.87
Sweden 1.47
Germany 1.24
USA 10.64